ContextGraf
DOC CONTEXTGRAF‑001 STATUS LIVE REV 2026.08 CLASS COMPLIANCE & GOVERNANCE OS
Compliance & Governance Operating System

Every requirement, risk, and test —
one living map.

ContextGraf turns your regulated engineering process into a living system of record that stays accurate automatically. Ask what your Design History File looked like on the day of your last submission, and get a real answer — not a spreadsheet reconstruction.

The problem

Your traceability matrix is only ever as true as the last person who remembered to update it.

Requirements live in Jira. Risk lives in a spreadsheet. Tests live in Jenkins. Somebody stitches them together by hand before every audit, and the moment anything changes, that picture is already stale.

Ask a regulated engineering team what their Design History File looked like on the day of their last submission. Most can't actually answer that — it's already been overwritten, and nobody kept the receipts.

What ContextGraf changes Every fact is an event, kept forever. Current state is derived, not remembered — which means the state on any past date is just as answerable as the state right now.
Capabilities

What's actually built in, not roadmapped.

Eight mechanisms that turn "we have a traceability tool" into "we can prove it, on any date, to anyone."

Identity

No AI ever decides who's who

Every requirement, hazard, and test resolves by its real source-system ID, deterministically. AI drafts relationships and language — never identity.

Audit trail

Hash-chained, tamper-evident

Every change is an immutable, cryptographically chained event. An operator with database access still can't rewrite history without breaking the chain.

Time-travel

Ask what was true, on any date

Tag a moment — "510(k) Preliminary Submission" — and revisit it forever. Computed live from real history, never a frozen export.

Impact

See the blast radius before you ship

Change one requirement and every downstream hazard, test, and commit is walked automatically — flagged before anyone has to ask.

Governance

AI proposes, a human signs

Suggested links, risk drafts, and change judgments sit visibly pending until confirmed — with a 21 CFR Part 11 electronic signature on the terminal decision.

Risk

Draft-quality FMEA, not a blank page

Requirements with no risk analysis yet get candidate ISO 14971 failure modes drafted for your risk engineer to review — never auto-filed.

Records

CAPA, non-conformance, complaints — connected

Quality records connect directly to your engineering data, aligned to 21 CFR 820 and ISO 13485 — not a separate system you reconcile by hand.

Export

SRS, SDD, DHF — generated, not assembled

Technical files render on demand, straight from current data, as PDF, Word, or Excel, from any as-of date or tagged milestone.

How it works

One trace, start to finish.

SOURCE
User Need
SRS‑204
Requirement
HAZ / RC
Risk Control
TC‑88
Test Case
GIT
Commit

Every link in that chain is a fact your existing tools already produce — Jira, Jama, GitHub, Jenkins, Confluence. ContextGraf's connectors normalize each one automatically, so the chain updates itself instead of waiting for someone to notice it's out of date.

Built for regulated industries

Speaks the standards your auditor already speaks.

ISO 14971 IEC 62304 21 CFR Part 11 21 CFR 820 ISO 13485

Today: Life Sciences & MedTech design controls, risk management, and electronic records. The same core engine is architected to extend to EU AI Act, financial controls, and general GRC — without re-platforming.

What's different

Not a nicer report. A different source of truth.

Traceability matrix rebuilt by hand before every audit.
Recomputed live from real history, every time you ask.
Test results get typed into a spreadsheet, sometimes.
CI/CD results land as versioned facts automatically.
AI suggestions and confirmed facts look the same.
Every AI suggestion stays visibly pending until a human signs it.
A correction silently overwrites the old value.
A correction splits history — nothing is ever erased.
eQMS lives in a separate system from engineering data.
CAPA, non-conformance, and complaints share the same system of record.

See your own traceability matrix, as of any date.

A working walkthrough on your own process — not a slide deck.

Request a walkthrough